Something is definitely off with your package manager. I am on ubuntu 22.04 as well and I have gwenhywfar-tools version 5.9.0-1 It's also the version reported on https://ubuntu.pkgs.org/22.04/ubuntu-universe-amd64/gwenhywfar-tools_5.9.0-1_amd64.deb.html
Version 5.1.3 is the one reported for 20.04. So are you sure you are on 22.04? If so then somehow your package manager is still pointing to 20.04 repositories. https://ubuntu.pkgs.org/20.04/ubuntu-universe-amd64/gwenhywfar-tools_5.1.3-1build1_amd64.deb.html I am able to build with no problem. I think the only changes were in installing a couple of packages shown on the wiki page where the old name has changed, but that was obvious as it failed when installing. On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:54 AM M <m_st...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I am trying to build gnucash 5.1 on Ubuntu 22.04, if thats possible. > > I have run apt-get update and apt-get upgrade, and everything is up to > date. > I have run sudo apt build-dep gnucash, and receive: > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > > When running cmake, I get the following error: > Requested 'gwenhywfar >= 5.6.0' but version of gwenhywfar is 5.1.3 > > Any idea how to install this update on Ubuntu 22.04? > When I run > sudo apt-get install gwenhywfar-tools > I get > gwenhywfar-tools is already the newest version (5.1.3-1build1) > > Is there any way to get the newer package on Ubuntu 22.04? > > Thanks, > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.