Hello Nicolas, I'm on GnuCash 5.3 already. Here you can freely choose the currency format in the import dialogue, i.e. the decimal separator can be changed from comma to point or vice versa. So updating your GnuCash could be very easy solution to your issue.
Greetings Carsten Am 31.08.2023 um 23:07 schrieb Nicolas de La Chaise via gnucash-user:
Hello all, First of all, I want to take this opportunity to thank all the posters and developers who dedicate so much of their time to help the ungrateful mass I belong to. You guys rock. Now, my silly problem... My bank only offers 2 formats when exporting transactions: either QIF or CSV. If I choose to import in QIF, there is no way to see the amount of the transaction that is being imported. I find it quite useful as some online shopping transactions can fall into many different accounts. Would it be possible to see it added in an upcoming version? Now, to go around this I was hoping to use the csv format. Only to hit a different problem. The CSV I import has French number formatting (decimal separator is ','). And when the import tool runs it seems to get awfully confused by it. In the screenshot below, amounts should be (for UK/US readers) -50.8 / -40.0 / -5.7 / -1.6 I already poked around with encoding and currency format to no avail. The amount is split in two and cannot be glued back together. Do anyone has a workaround? Note: GNC 4.4 Debian 10 Thanks a lot! N. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
_______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
