On 13/7/2026 10:45, Bruce Schuck wrote:
Peter,
There is no Crypt::OpenSSL module. There are modules such as
Crypt::OpenSSL::EDSCA, Crypt::OpenSSL::AES, and others. This would
explain seeing .../Crypt/OpenSSL/... paths in Perl's @INC.
Hi, Bruce, thanks for the clarification. This is an area of Perl where I
have very little experience.
I believe John may have meant to have you install Crypt::SSLeay.
Another module you may want to update is LWP::Protocol::https.
On my Ubuntu 22.04 desktop the versions of those modules are currently:
LWP::Protocol::https 6.10
Net::SSLeay 1.92
Crypt::SSLeay 0.73_06
I had:
Net::SSLeay 1.96
LWP::Protocol::https 6.07
And I don't have Crypt::SSLeay installed. doing a find over all of @INC
only turns up Net/SSLeay directories, and no Crypt/SSLeay directories.
I updated LWP::Protocol::https (now 6.15), and that didn't help, either
with a bare Perl test or with Gnucash.
I tried installing Crypt::SSLeay, but it failed:
% sudo cpan Crypt::SSLeay
Reading '/Users/prl/.cpan/Metadata'
Database was generated on Sun, 12 Jul 2026 23:41:02 GMT
Running install for module 'Crypt::SSLeay'
Fetching with LWP:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NA/NANIS/Crypt-SSLeay-0.72.tar.gz
Fetching with LWP:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NA/NANIS/CHECKSUMS
Checksum for
/Users/prl/.cpan/sources/authors/id/N/NA/NANIS/Crypt-SSLeay-0.72.tar.gz
ok
Configuring N/NA/NANIS/Crypt-SSLeay-0.72.tar.gz with Makefile.PL
Cannot link with any of the requested SSL libraries 'ssl, crypto,
ssl32, ssleay32, eay32, libeay32, z'
No 'Makefile' created NANIS/Crypt-SSLeay-0.72.tar.gz
/usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL -- NOT OK
%
It looks like I'm missing some libraries, but I have no idea how to get
them or even where they would be expected to be found.
Cheers, and thanks for your help,
Peter
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
[email protected]
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
