On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 17:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is it OK to enter GNU Go 2.0, Liberty 1.0 and > > heavily randomized GNU Go 3.6 to Sixth and > > any future KGS Computer Go Tournaments in Open division? > > I don't see a problem if Gunnar, Arend and Paul do > not. I understand from your previous messages that > this is OK with Nick Wedd. But I have a comment > about the following: > > > --name="tuned GnuGo. If I'm too hard, try SimpleBot. > > If I'm too easy, try human s or LibertyBot. - " > > This could be misunderstood to imply that the > program is stronger than GNU Go, for two > reasons. First, tuning to us is a process of > improving the program, and second, GNU Go is > not mentioned as an alternative under ``If I'm too > easy ...'' >
Announce line was/is this: GnuGo 3.6 with a lot of randomization I have changed that blurb also to read this: --name="heavily randomized GnuGo. If I'm too hard, try SimpleBot. If I'm too easy, try humans or LibertyBot. - " > The reason we might care is that someone might form > a negative opinion about GNU Go after defeating an > older or deliberately weakened version. > > Daniel Bump > > > > _______________________________________________ > gnugo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel -- Aloril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
