>> From the point of view of general computer go improvements, in other >> words, someone, anyone, making a really strong computer go program, the >> fact that GnuGo is a traditional style go program has kept the MCTS >> programs honest. > > What do you mean?
Without GnuGo, places like CGOS would have been little more than an exercise in self-play; they would have been over-optimizing to beat other MCTS programs at the expense of the quality of their play against humans. Your suggestion of using monte carlo in local searches, or to estimate group strength, instead of just "boring, old" global MCTS searches, is interesting (to me), as it keeps GnuGo having a different style of play from the rest of the field. Darren -- Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer http://dcook.org/mlsn/ (English-Japanese-German-Chinese-Arabic open source dictionary/semantic network) http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work) http://dcook.org/blogs.html (My blogs and articles) _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
