I think that's a missunderstanding: after the discussion here I'm not sure anyone actually intended to suggest the creation of a COOP/eG. At least I read the "cooperative" discussion more as a thought experiment on how to cooperate to enable developers to spend more time on the project, and for that to consider alternative lifestyles / forms of organization.
But like you, I also first thought that creating a COOP was the suggestion (and only the discussion here clarified this a bit for me, but regardless the outcome of the discussion remains highly intangible). Regardless, I agree with you that creating a COOP/eG is not the right move for GNUnet (at least as an organizational form for the overall project). On 6/26/19 9:36 PM, Fabian Gerlach wrote: > Hello again, > > my 2 cents: > I'm for keeping the organizational form as it is (eV), because the change > from eV to COOP/eG goes hand in hand with a shift away from the actual matter > (the development of GNUnet, Freedom in networking) and towards making profit > (with GNUnet), and that would be bad. > > > > Best regards, > Fabian > > > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
