As I understood this really has nothing to do with the eV or the organisational form (in legal terms).
It was more related to how to organise processes within the GNUnet project/community. Regarding the eV/making profit: AFAIK the GUNnet eV is already _for_ profit even if it does not actively accumulate any :) > On 27. Jun 2019, at 17:30, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi, > > I don't understand why this is open for discussion, as it seems. > Exploration should be up to the listed members of the eV, which is one of the > points > exclusive to the eV where a difference of groups makes sense. > > I was not around, but I was told it's just exploration atm. > > Fabian Gerlach transcribed 653 bytes: >> Hello again, >> >> my 2 cents: >> I'm for keeping the organizational form as it is (eV), because the change >> from eV to COOP/eG goes hand in hand with a shift away from the actual >> matter (the development of GNUnet, Freedom in networking) and towards making >> profit (with GNUnet), and that would be bad. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> Fabian >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GNUnet-developers mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
