On 2/24/2012 11:17 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: > (any family Judges who could quickly point you to this type of > access, whom we also have to thank? ;-) )
No, and let's not talk about the possibility of that happening. :) They studiously avoid commenting on current cases or controversies. Doing so is a breach of judicial ethics on the same level as a physician violating the confidence of medical information -- they take it dead seriously and deeply dislike even casual talk of the subject. There are a few exceptions in the ethics code for subjects like teaching law (Dad teaches a "Current Cases and Controversies Before The Court", for instance), but family members aren't one of them. Whenever I mention an opinion, a brief, anything of the sort, you can be confident of two things: (a) it did not come from my judicial relatives and (b) I don't know what they think of it. Every family has unwritten rules they rely upon in order to keep things sane. This is one of ours. :) _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
