On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:40:02PM -0400 Also sprach Robert J. Hansen: > What I *am* interested in, though, are content errors. It is quite > likely I have a few in there, and maybe even a few howlers. So please, > take a look and see what you think.
Thanks for taking the time to write this; here are a few minor points I have elected to comment on: Section 2.6: For Solaris 11, gnupg is also available via the default IPS publisher. The version Oracle provides is 2.0.17 vs 2.0.18 from OpenCSW, but it is worth mentioning as it may satisfy parties who are unwilling (or unable) to install via 3rd-party software sources. Section 4.11 Should almost certainly mention GnuPG integration with Evolution, which is still the default Gnome email client on many *nix distros. Also, for Mutt, I believe I can help with some of the "FIXME"s: Plugin? None required, provided both Mutt and GnuPG are installed properly. Supports GnuPG versions: 1.4 and 2.0 Supports pgp/mime? Yes Actively developed? Yes (though the "stable" version is only updated very infrequently, the project's CVS repo is still seeing activity). Project blurb: Mutt's GnuPG interoperability is good, but it may require extensive manual configuration for it to work properly (but if you're using Mutt, you already know that). See http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttGuide/UseGPG for configuration details. General comment: For users completely new to GnuPG (and encryption in general), the use of the related terms "certificate" and "key" throughout the FAQ may be confusing. Questions like "What's a certificate?" "What's a key?" and "What's the difference?" may deserve an explanation someplace. A good place might be in the "Terminology" section, which itself should perhaps appear earlier in the FAQ. Regards, Kevin _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
