On 6/4/12 12:35 PM, Kevin Kammer wrote: > Section 2.6: For Solaris 11, gnupg is also available via the default > IPS publisher. The version Oracle provides is 2.0.17 vs 2.0.18 from > OpenCSW, but it is worth mentioning as it may satisfy parties who are > unwilling (or unable) to install via 3rd-party software sources.
I am unfortunately Solaris-impaired: IPS publisher? If you could provide a sentence or two explaining this (preferably in the same general format/wording as the other sections), I'd appreciate it greatly. > Section 4.11 Should almost certainly mention GnuPG integration with > Evolution, which is still the default Gnome email client on many *nix > distros. D'oh, yes. Although I don't know if they support inline signatures yet. I know they support PGP/MIME (rather obsessively) and that inline signatures have been a requested feature, but I'd need someone to confirm the status there -- as well as whether it supports GnuPG 1.4 or 2.0. > Also, for Mutt, I believe I can help with some of the "FIXME"s: Thank you! > General comment: For users completely new to GnuPG (and encryption in > general), the use of the related terms "certificate" and "key" > throughout the FAQ may be confusing. Questions like "What's a > certificate?" "What's a key?" and "What's the difference?" may deserve > an explanation someplace. A good place might be in the "Terminology" > section, which itself should perhaps appear earlier in the FAQ. A good point. I'll introduce it, but for now I'm going to leave the overall numbering intact -- reorgs should take place once the document is stable, not while there's still churn. :) _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
