On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:11, r...@sixdemonbag.org said: > I would suggest "SHA256 RIPEMD160", myself. There are no known attacks > on RIPEMD160, and if you're in a situation that requires the use of a
But only because RIPEMD160 does not get as much attention as SHA-1. I doubt that RIPEMD160 is in any way stronger than SHA-1. Even European authorities switched to SHA-1 a few years ago. Another advantage of SHA-1 and SHA-2 are the hardware accelerators available in modern CPUs. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users