-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Sunday 30 November 2014 at 7:21:09 PM, in <mid:7B3B0E.547B7C39.0002@gate>, gnupgp...@on.yourweb.de wrote: > So, is there a known issue regarding the order of > DSA-subkeys for signing? How to change order of subkeys > for testing purpose? - From (possibly inaccurate) memory, PGP was up to somewhere around version 8.x before it supported signing subkeys. IIRC, older PGP versions would choke on trying to encrypt to a key whose newest subkey was flagged for signing but not encryption, and would use the main key to sign with. (I have no recollection of what happened trying to verify signatures.) - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Ultimate consistency lies in being consistently inconsistent -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlR72ABXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pOzwD/3c6wAOrasH0OnbKbtt2vIyICXtII/ziOsc3 bKdIR6//JSMesoWejVQOQocH5xq0mAbvhsCW41LCy4yOxVHuyQ7F3s3dU/WQLKWW qlMnBJ/ATIFAgGJ34DL1SUrRLEwU+hbX6gzk8Bsq+IM1LxdxNORg6BYbTMcKBRPE nGgf41W1iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUe9gAXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRp b25zLm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZB NUEwRjU2QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwUSAH/2rJW01PxmMFvRgw WiWJ5GOfFoqlXApF6pBCgq9jwBwH2hxanc0F1xy7cTs04MMN4vmGjRzruBqO5V4c BeWQSNTkc+RR6YZ+3GF9/ERA/mCOLnUu4irQCs1Akg7n7+ifU3ZFUi4Ip+4Rip5L uYfBuJ7ngsSM1xGQG1wpLI1XNo9B6onphMAaAOY3QYgQy7cyUF5kK3he1DvKwOTM PxgO3cZxyICml+Y8BWeVA7YArm9snrBKKFGGXMdOKXNuKy0IyqTU/vguynxrY9rv D+9tMEpSBaRjKcpvuB0ZDkrXEAQy4+UzFLgKSHUAjE4AQUjQk5eTsEoZ+ARD1Y9a MZyjAWM= =ic9w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users