On 01-12-2014 15:47, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > You are testing a modern tool that aims to be standards-compliant > against an unmaintained, known-broken program that was out of date > before the standards were even settled. When you found an > incompatibility, you reported the problem against the modern, > standards-compliant tool.
It seems logical to me to report it to the only one of those that is still maintained. I doubt very much there will ever be a pgp 6.5.8a to address those issues. But now I think of it, wasn't 6.5.8 the pgp version with all those CKT (Cyber Knight Templar) versions? Perhaps one of those solved this issue? -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
