-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Friday 31 July 2015 at 8:15:23 AM, in <mid:[email protected]>, listo factor wrote: > The problem with most "e-mail reform" proposals (this > one included) is that they don't address what is the > primary problem of essential users of the encrypted > communication: that to their attackers the knowledge of > who communicates with whom is of greater value than the > content of the message. Taken in the round for general surveillance purposes, yes. But for a relatively small number of messages, it's the content that is more valuable. For example, if Bob emails Alice his credit card details (or commercial secrets). > Without solving that primary > problem, the motivation for the adoption of any new > scheme is either low or non-existent. One scheme that does address the metadata issue is Confidant Mail <https://confidantmail.org/>. - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:[email protected]> Editing is a rewording activity -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVu06gXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwCBEIALXYGEGvGxGs8xYLq1LDekON FNqOeZzhUGzdfxP4Os8isSQ5X3g53Ffz1rG5RnoQpob1bbn8FqogonWp5IMcogdL TRyBuAftzVlUybMweqavaeQZ8QuegUnnKZ0FolqVYMHyDL2q1TMT9djln6nbltfD xq1jGOZFTKolaaxTbyJG3N6B93Jd8ETrWjRqkPIaMvkmtiMFFJ/tTWfxwqm54nPz s2vTYbA8+wSAK20UOzA0lajoETQAhuqTgFezq+kbbqvDf4XfbptauUyTmJptdyp4 sfaSy3qJMa3QVp12ewGhtLRm/rDM/QLdZQf73bNxIJqtXobQxPBT0Y6R6NTfyCGI vgQBFgoAZgUCVbtPFV8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45NywAP4qRDGwXwazn3s6rEnVmvpiHyoY dRh2UVMrHCxkmUOIdQEAuOFcDGCa/7jRxwdXdgZKBTOzz2x9JdK9xLcvMFR9tQ4= =vbCb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
