On 05/09/18 16:29, Fiedler Roman wrote: > Apart from that, is not the > > [GNUPG:] VALIDSIG 25CE8B1D52A5B231543F8D660EE7BE094144A67F 2018-09-05 > 1536157493 0 4 0 1 8 00 25CE8B1D52A5B231543F8D660EE7BE094144A67F > > more suited for checking?
Generally: no. It just indicates the signature is cryptographically valid, it does not indicate whether the *key* is valid. With --trust-model always and a non-revoked key; perhaps. HTH, Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
