> With all due respect, do you think when Hagrid and even good old SKS > key servers supports this feature that people would not applaud you if > you would consider including it in GnuPG too and reflecting it in the > respective RFC?
Speaking for myself, I have "rfc4880" in my gpg.conf for damned good reasons. I *do not* want GnuPG to generate UID-less certificates in strict compliance mode, I *do not* want GnuPG to use them in strict compliance mode. I have no opinion on "--allow-broken-certificates" and only allowing them to be generated in expert mode after a clear warning about it being noncompliant. I also think this is the wrong place to talk about how the RFC should be changed. Take it to the WG, please.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
