I understand. I do not expect to to solve these problems over here, but I am getting useful suggestions and yours is one of them. It may seem a little to you but I find the responses enlightening. You are probably concerned that I may not get adequate returns for the time I spend here: I appreciate that. That is a mark of a good character you have.
Although it has not been my intention to advertise, I got a few good responses off list as a side effect. I will engage people formally as you suggest when the time comes for it.
Before that happens. I am coding a prototype right now that is not going to be inadequate; but all this will help me arrive at a better understanding, help demonstrate basic ideas and hopefully prepare me and others for the production of a better specifications, better action and better product.
I apologize if I am encroaching. Thanks, Ayoub On 7/28/2020 5:17 PM, raf via Gnupg-users wrote:
You might be asking in the wrong place. We can suggest helpful things like vetting staff, hardware security
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
