On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:24 PM Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote: > > Hello Stefan! > > > [...] > > sequoia did the right step and I hope for people relying on GnuPG that > > it is possible for them in the future too. > > So did Sequoia do that? > You consider not to follow policies "the right step"? > Sorry, but you dont have a clue about security! > > The only right way is to follow policies word by word. > > So far you only presented us assumptions here, with a non working setup, > and also a setup which never was intended for such a case.
Hi Juergen, looks like you are a bit upset, like probably others as well. That is good and I hope people understand what this whole thread is about! Regarding security, can you give us a valid example what security implications you see? I trust the sequoia team, for example, strongly assuming, that they know how to implement fetching a binary blob without any problems. BTW. If I remember correctly you once (or I did that?) presented a link from Austrian Goverment authorities using OpenPGP keys on their web pages. I am not aware how their network is set-up and it is not my business, but would you not agree that it would be very nice to have a wildcard subdomain solution, for all their inhouse offices and employees email addresses, while managing themselves key distribution? BTW. For GitHub users ... :-) ( a nice addition too, when it comes to OpenPGP keys) https://keyoxide.org/guides/github Regards Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users