BTW, 9300 packages imported now. 3700 missing... On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 10:27 -0500, Tim Spriggs wrote: > I think we need to wait and see what happens when main is enabled for > builds before we can judge what will happen ultimately with depends.
Right. This make sense to fix prior to addressing the rest of it. > I > don't think having packages with unmet depends in the unstable > repository is a bad thing. I think in the worst scenario we can simply > migrate known good packages to testing/stable and leave unmet packages > in unstable. Having the packages there helps to get people involved: if > they want to use the package they can help satisfy a few depends. +1 I generally agree with this statement. I forgot that "testing" is not yet propagated, so we can use this... Good idea. I wonder if we could utilize apt-get's ordering simulation, i.e. to verify if package A is "good" do this in a script: if apt-get install -s A; then echo "A: good" upload hardy-testing A else echo "A: bad ..." fi _______________________________________________ gnusol-devel mailing list gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel