Le 15 juin 05 à 07:38, Stefan Urbanek a écrit :
Citát Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I only have one comment. The object doens't have to be a view.
It can be
any
object at all. So it's possible to just use a normal step talk
object
instead
of making StepTalkView. :)
I know, I know :-)
I was going to create a non-view object as well, but in fact having a
view is quite
nice after playing with it -- you could even create a panel (hidden
by default)
just to group them as you want... I also have other ideas, we'll see.
Well anyway I'll add a non-view object too for the next version, it's
not exactly hard
to do and it could be useful too :-)
We can discuss this later.
I add that if you can make non-appkit object that would be included
in an
application, then I can add it to the StepTalk.framework. Therefore
there would
be no need for other library to link. The Gorm part is, of course,
up to Greg.
Well, it's easy to make a non-appkit object, but as I'd still want a
view anyway,
.. hmm.. I need to try, perhaps just defining the view in the
palette will be enough
after all, you're right.
--
Nicolas Roard
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
-Arthur C. Clarke
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev