Am Montag, 25.07.05 um 22:26 Uhr schrieb Helge Hess:
On 25. Jul 2005, at 02:35 Uhr, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
Well, my first thought was: why another templating engine? We
already have WO (either in SOPE or in gstep-web).
maybe because WO would be overkill for some simple tasks (or do you
use a semitrailer truck to carry a crate of beer to your home)?
Hear hear! ;-)
The WO framework just has ~20 public classes and is hardely a truck,
its rather a beautifully modular bike:
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/LegacyTechnologies/
WebObjects/WebObjects_4.5/System/Library/Frameworks/
WebObjects.framework/ObjC_classic/WebObjectsTOC.html
I wasn't aware that WO was such a lithe and lissom animal once. it has
put on a lot weight since then (Java disease?). This:
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/WebObjects/Reference/API/
index.html is definitely a truck. (and yeah, you omitted EOF, could you
install WO without it those days?)
Stripping down to the classes required for templating you may end up
with something like 5-10 classes for text rendering.
Greets,
Helge
regards, Lars
--
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
OpenGroupware.org
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev