Citát Helge Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 25. Jul 2005, at 02:35 Uhr, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: > >> Well, my first thought was: why another templating engine? We > >> already have WO (either in SOPE or in gstep-web). > > maybe because WO would be overkill for some simple tasks (or do you > > use a semitrailer truck to carry a crate of beer to your home)? > > Hear hear! ;-) > > The WO framework just has ~20 public classes and is hardely a truck, > its rather a beautifully modular bike: > http://developer.apple.com/documentation/LegacyTechnologies/ > WebObjects/WebObjects_4.5/System/Library/Frameworks/ > WebObjects.framework/ObjC_classic/WebObjectsTOC.html >
What about WO dependencies? ... > Stripping down to the classes required for templating you may end up > with something like 5-10 classes for text rendering. > "stripping down ..." does not seem like out-of-the-box solution... Nothing against WO - each tool has its purpose... Regards, Stefan Urbanek -- http://stefan.agentfarms.net First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
