--- Sa¹o Kiselkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody > > I know there have been tons of discussions and > flames on this topic, but this > time I have a solution for it. For details, please > read > http://openspace.adlerka.sk/NativeFrameworks and > tell me your opinion: is it > worth bothering about further, or just blow the > whole thing in the wind. And > please don't stone me if you don't agree with the > details... > > Best regards > Saso > hi just took a quick glance at this document, will look more closely later... after my foray into hacking the dynamic linker... i took another look at this, i haven't actually tried this yet as i don't currently have a glibc-2.4 available and there might be another option... new in glibc-2.4 is LD_AUDIT support this is only available currently as an environment variable... but with an audit lib and an implementation of la_objsearch() it *seems* possible.. (i'm thinking that the frameworks link with an extended substitution sequence, and the audit lib turns the substitution sequence into a real search path...) e.g. --Wl,-soname,"$FRAMEWORK/foo.framework/Versions/A/foo" then la_objsearch() looks for $FRAMEWORK and replaces it with the path found.. gnu ld last i looked doesn't support the -p and -P options (from solaris ld) which would be nice to link frameworks against the audit lib without forcing the use of the LD_AUDIT variable. so only apps using frameworks or whatever would need the audit lib and matt ______________________________________________________ Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/ _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
