On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
I've think I've forgotten - why was gna.org nixed? The reason I ask is
that I talked to RMS and surprisingly, he's not opposed to us moving
the repository if we really want to, although he would prefer us going
to gna.org. He does not like sourceware.org
We should also talk about all the implications this might involve. For
instance, the current CVS archive at savannah will still be there, so
we have to inform people about that.
Plus we can't say, 'just update from CVS' to everyone who has a
problem anymore. Most people won't have svn, even if they knew how to
do that stuff. We need to update things like the daily snapshots.
I wonder if we could still mirror the repository on CVS? Either at gna
or savannah. Even if it is read-only.
I'm still not sure I want to leave savannah, but they're so
understaffed, it seems like it could be a long long time before they
have a useful system working.
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev