Andy, --- Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:20:53PM -0600, Adam Fedor wrote: > > No, they will not do that. We could just as easily decide to make our > > project non-free and then tell everyone to delete their free copies of > > the project. I don't think that would go over well :-) > > Ah, well, I think most of the developers will catch on pretty quick ;) > We can put up some README.MOVED files in various places perhaps? This might be a good idea. > > >/libs/base/{trunk,tags,branches} > > >/libs/gui/{trunk,tags,branches} > > >/libs/Renaissance/{trunk,tags,branches} > > >/apps/Gorm/{trunk,tags,branches} > > >/apps/gworkspace/{trunk,tags,branches} > > > > > >and so on. > > > > > >We could then have something like: > > > > > >/modules/dev-apps > > >/modules/core > > >/modules/dev-libs > > > > > > > > Sure. but I am not very familiar with svn. > > Maybe someone who is familiar with svn can give a basic OK to this > layout. Greg? I believe, that until we come up with a plan to modularize things further, we should leave the directory layout as it is. The way I see it we have two choices: 1) Take the CVS repository whole-cloth into the SVN repo and make any changes incrementally from there. 2) Take the burden of a redesign/relayout now and put it into SVN in some new layout. I, personally, prefer the incremental approach as it doesn't cause too much disruption. Moving to SVN is disruption enought. ;) > > Were will we actually be transferring this project to? > > i.e.: Are we going to create a gnustep project on gna? > > Who will be admin and who will determine access rights? > > There is a gnustep gna project already. I'm sure Alex Perez (who has it > registered) wouldn't mind setting you up as administrator and some other > people that could give out the commit access although we'll have to ask > him. > > Alex set the gnustep project up on gna due to Savannah not being able to > set up a -ui and -packagers mailing list when they were needed some time > ago. > > > How will we verify that the transfer was correct? > > I'm not sure what the best approach would be here. Subversion has > repository-wide revision numbers, so it is difficult to check that > (although the original CVS revision number will be stored in the > metadata for the file). I can run a couple diffs on various different > dates through the history (including the latest) svn vs. cvs? This would be easier to verify if we simply did a wholesale copy from one repo to another. Unless you're referring to *all* of the metadata (history, etc) for each file. That's somewhat more difficult. :) > - Andy GJC Gregory John Casamento -- CEO/President Open Logic Corp. (A MD Corp.) ## Maintainer of Gorm (IB Equiv.) for GNUstep. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev