Sheldon Gill schrieb: > David Ayers wrote: > >> You mean other than releases? Well since we have defined repository >> states through revision numbers, I can't think of any necessity for more >> tags. It's not like gnustep is seeing the kind of development activity >> like, say, GCC. But maybe you have something specific in mind? > > > Main releases are obvious. I'm wondering about branch snapshots.
Not sure why you'd want a snapshot of a branch unless your releasing from branch (as in dedicated release branches with bugfix releases à la GCC). >>> - Are we going to import more vendor trees? (like ffcall, portaudio >>> etc) >> >> >> I think we should keep anything not FSF assigned in a separate >> repository so we have clear boundaries from where we can blindly >> copy-and-paste code. Other than that I think there should be a >> dedicated maintainer(s) for any external vendor tree who will keep them >> up to date. > > > I'm not sure we need a separate repository. Wouldn't a vendor directory > tree would make the boundary equally clear? > Other than that, I'm in agreement with this. > IMO the copyright assignment boundary should be pretty clear especially if we have all projects at top level as was originally proposed, IIRC. I'm still in favor of a separate repository, but that's just my opinion. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev