On 2006-08-26 18:27:12 +0200 Gregory John Casamento
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This would make a lot of sense.... although... I thought we already
had a
list like that here:
https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?group_id=99
It would be better to track this as a set of tasks so that the
process is
less ad-hoc.
Ah, yes, I thought I remembered having seen it but couldn't find it
anymore. Cool. At least the Wiki should link to it.
However that brings me to another question that may look like
flame-bait...
Let's say there's a framework that implements one or more 'wanted'
classes but are licensed under, say, BSDL.
Would it be permissible to add those classes to GNUstep (since it's
LGPL) or would those classes have to be 'handed over' to FSF, changing
the license in the process?
And what if the author doesn't want to change the original license but
adds a section that additionally puts the code under LGPL (that is, as
a dual license) provided / as long as the code is used in GNUstep?
I honestly do not know, but would like to...
--
Chris
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
