On 8/28/06, Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> And what if the author doesn't want to change the original license > but adds a section that additionally puts the code under LGPL (that > is, as a dual license) provided / as long as the code is used in GNUstep? Yes, that would be much easier that having to figure out how GNUstep should be used under multiple licenses.
I was asking because I got a couple of classes that are 'missing' in GNUstep, that I'd like to 'hand over' to GNUstep directly, most of all NSNetServices and I usually put everything under a dual BSD/(L)GPL and I'm not very keen on signing anything (in general). However, if there's interest in at least adding NSNetServices, and signing is a requirement for inclusion, I'll do so. -- Chris _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
