Since, you're the one making this assertion, I believe it's up to you to prove that we have broken it in every release.
I don't have the same impression. GJC -- Gregory Casamento ----- Original Message ---- From: Helge Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Developer GNUstep <gnustep-dev@gnu.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2006 12:26:39 PM Subject: Re: gnustep release numbers On Oct 4, 2006, at 13:46, David Ayers wrote: > IIRC we have a long > discussion in the archive about not bumping SO numbers unless we know > binary compatibility was broken. Did we have a single gstep-base release which did NOT break the ABI? I don't think so. As mentioned in that long discussion ;-) I'm in favor of doing an occasional ABI stable release and have frequent ABI unstable ones properly tagged as such. The latter then do not need to preserve ABI stability for sonames. Greets, Helge -- Helge Hess http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/ _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
