>> I don't agree at all ... the System domain will of course be /usr, and >> the Local domain will be /usr/local. Otherwise, why do we have >> domains at all ? :-) > > Well, according to the FHS, if you download GNUstep and compile it on > your own (not obtaining it from your distribution), then it should go > under /usr/local, or /opt. In which case, Local and System are probably > equivalent, since GNUstep itself is a "local" package, and there is no > distribution involved. > > But if you obtain GNUstep from your distribution, then it should > definitely go under /usr.
Yes :-) > So IMHO by default, the System and Local domains should be /usr/local, > but the distributions will of course override that for their own > packages. I would rather say that, by default, System is /usr and Local is /usr/local, and source packages install by default into Local. Distributions will override that for their own packages. If System/Local domains are the same (/usr/local), then we would ignore /usr, so resources from system packages in /usr would not be found. Really, if System packages are in /usr, the System domain should be available as /usr. This means resources/frameworks/bundles/etc. in System (/usr) would be available/visibile to -make, -base and to any other gnustep stuff (such as openapp or whatever). Thanks _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev