> Well if apple did the work like they should have done. This would not > be an issue. So I still say blame apple and not support clang for the > same reason.
In practical terms that stance doesn't exactly lead to us ending up with a good complier though does it? Clang is a v.good compiler, and is being maintained. Not supporting it is rather biting off our nose to spite our face, especially if GCC isn't interested in supporting ObjC anymore. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
