On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Pete French <p...@twisted.org.uk> wrote: > In practical terms that stance doesn't exactly lead to us ending up with > a good complier though does it? Clang is a v.good compiler, and is being > maintained. Not supporting it is rather biting off our nose to spite > our face, especially if GCC isn't interested in supporting ObjC anymore.
Well GCC is interested in Objective-C except we don't have anyone really working on it. That is the biggest issue right now. We want to support it; trust me. If someone would step up to the plate and do the supporting work, we will keep it. The biggest issue is that Apple had stepped up to the plate and then disappeared to go do clang because of politics due to GPLv3. Since GNUStep is a GNU project I think we should support GPLv3 friendly companies/projects before we give in to ones that don't want to even want to look at GPLv3 code. Thanks, Andrew Pinski _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
