On 30 Jan 2013, at 09:02, Fred Kiefer wrote: > On 30.01.2013 09:39, David Chisnall wrote: >> I don't see this behaviour with r36030. When I update to the latest >> svn (r36036), I see a huge number of compiler warnings from >> mismatched types in method declarations and definitions. It seems >> that a lot of changes to headers were committed, but not the >> corresponding changes to the implementations, so you're going to end >> up with a lot of mismatched call frames. > > Didn't you want to join in for this NSInteger/NSUInteger/CGFloat cleanup? > That way things would go a lot faster. Just one person ploughing through all > of GNUstep gui code will take weeks if not months. If we all worked together > this could be over in less than a week.
Yup, I'm currently going through, I should be committing the change in a few minutes. > Interestingly with gcc I don't get any new compiler warning. And as far as I > am aware I changed all the method implementations where I changed the > interface. This is of course not true for subclasses. You might be getting > the warnings there. Otherwise this is really serious and I should know about > it. I've spent the last half hour compiling with -Werror and fixing everything that stops compilation, and I'm now probably about 80% of the way through, so there were a nontrivial number of errors. GCC's warnings are, apparently, not up to much... David -- Sent from my Difference Engine _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev