(Sorry, forgot to CC the list) Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
> Von: Niels Grewe <niels.gr...@halbordnung.de> > Betreff: Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal > Datum: 7. Januar 2014 13:00:12 MEZ > An: David Chisnall <thera...@sucs.org> > > > Am 07.01.2014 um 12:06 schrieb David Chisnall <thera...@sucs.org>: > >> On 7 Jan 2014, at 10:49, Richard Frith-Macdonald >> <richardfrithmacdon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> I read 'Objective-C 2' as 'we support the features Apple introduced in >>>> 2005! Yay!' >>> >>> You may be unusual in that. >> >> Possibly, but the 2006 WWDC was the first and last time Apple referred to a >> set of new Objective-C features as Objective-C 2. The term Objective-C 2 >> does not appear in current Apple docs, > > <nitpicking> > That’s not quite true: Some of the documents still talk about something > called "Objective-C 2.0“, most notably the runtime programming guide: > > https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjCRuntimeGuide/Articles/ocrtVersionsPlatforms.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40008048-CH106-SW1 > </nitpicking> > > But that doesn’t make the term any more intelligible. I think we should > prefer to use a concise description of the feature set over any marketing > mumbo jumbo. > > Cheers, > > Niels _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev