SGTM. Especially when binary packages are built.

Which shells execute /etc/profile.d? Could this break csh et al?

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Gregory Casamento <
greg.casame...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey guys.
>
> I'm wondering if placing a symbolic link to GNUstep.sh on install might
> not be a good idea.  Other frameworks (qt) do this to add environment
> variables to the shell when the user logs in.  I currently do this and it
> makes using GNUstep much nicer since the environment is already configured
> whether I am using the FHS layout or the GNUstep layout.
>
> I just wanted to see what everyone thought about doing this before taking
> any steps.
>
> We currently do something similar to this by adding GNUstep.conf in /etc,
> but this does not set up the environment (at least not for me).
>
> Please let me know your thoughts.
>
> ​GC​
>
> --
> Gregory Casamento
> Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
> yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa
> (240)274-9630 (Cell)
> http://www.gnustep.org
> http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>
>


-- 
Ivan Vučica
i...@vucica.net
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Reply via email to