SGTM. Especially when binary packages are built. Which shells execute /etc/profile.d? Could this break csh et al?
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Gregory Casamento < greg.casame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey guys. > > I'm wondering if placing a symbolic link to GNUstep.sh on install might > not be a good idea. Other frameworks (qt) do this to add environment > variables to the shell when the user logs in. I currently do this and it > makes using GNUstep much nicer since the environment is already configured > whether I am using the FHS layout or the GNUstep layout. > > I just wanted to see what everyone thought about doing this before taking > any steps. > > We currently do something similar to this by adding GNUstep.conf in /etc, > but this does not set up the environment (at least not for me). > > Please let me know your thoughts. > > GC > > -- > Gregory Casamento > Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant > yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa > (240)274-9630 (Cell) > http://www.gnustep.org > http://heronsperch.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > Gnustep-dev@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev > > -- Ivan Vučica i...@vucica.net
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev