Only bash cares about what's in profile.d. Also a number of different frameworks already do this for various reasons. It seems perfectly reasonable for us to do this upon installation.
GC On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: > SGTM. Especially when binary packages are built. > > Which shells execute /etc/profile.d? Could this break csh et al? > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Gregory Casamento < > greg.casame...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey guys. >> >> I'm wondering if placing a symbolic link to GNUstep.sh on install might >> not be a good idea. Other frameworks (qt) do this to add environment >> variables to the shell when the user logs in. I currently do this and it >> makes using GNUstep much nicer since the environment is already configured >> whether I am using the FHS layout or the GNUstep layout. >> >> I just wanted to see what everyone thought about doing this before taking >> any steps. >> >> We currently do something similar to this by adding GNUstep.conf in /etc, >> but this does not set up the environment (at least not for me). >> >> Please let me know your thoughts. >> >> GC >> >> -- >> Gregory Casamento >> Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant >> yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa >> (240)274-9630 (Cell) >> http://www.gnustep.org >> http://heronsperch.blogspot.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gnustep-dev mailing list >> Gnustep-dev@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev >> >> > > > -- > Ivan Vučica > i...@vucica.net > -- Gregory Casamento Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) http://www.gnustep.org http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
