Nice web UIs make tracking changes easy and perhaps even enjoyable. Git ecosystem has a couple of web services that let you do that.
Git would also make it easier to do code review for new developers before they make changes directly in the tree. Despite some annoying UI decisions, I'm in favor of going the Git way, leaving the Subversion tree around but read only, of course. (I doubt that conversion to Git is completely lossless, especially if we get multiple repositories out of one.) On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Fred Kiefer <fredkie...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I don't see the big benefit in switching to git, but I wont resist that > move either. We don't have that many branches of GNUstep, so cherry picking > changes wont happen that often. We should make sure that the people using > the only official branch, testplant, are willing to move too. Otherwise > there would be really no point to it. > > Cheers, > Fred > > On the road > > Am 25.05.2015 um 09:09 schrieb Gregory Casamento <greg.casame...@gmail.com > >: > > > Hey guys, > > > > I wanted to run this past the community to see what the general feeling > is. I am considering a move back to savannah utilizing git instead of > subversion. > > > > The implementation of git on savannah, I believe, allows checkout and > check-in VIA subversion. I would at least like to try to maintain a mirror > there (like the one on github) so that everything can be accessed in one > place and those who want to use git can do so. > > > > The reasons I have for thinking about using git are: > > > > 1) the branching and cherrypicking capabilities. I think it's well > known that git's capabilities in this area far outstrip those of SVN > hands-down. I don't think there's any debate on this issue. > > > > 2) community. Rightly or wrongly a large community of developers prefer > git over any other SCMS. While I understand that certain people in our > community don't like git for religious reasons, I also think it's time to > reconsider religious arguments for technical decisions. > > > > 3) Actively developed. GIT is under active development. There have > been few releases of SVN over the last few years. One might attribute this > to stability, but there haven't been that many advancements in SVN in a > while. > > > > 4) Tools. There are a wider range of tools on Linux, Windows and Mac to > deal with git repositories these days. Additionally there are tools which > can be used to make code reviews much easier. > > > > I would like to reach some sort of consensus on this rather than a flame > war. I would ask that only active committers comment on this email thread > so that we can be clear about the reasons for or against this move. I > have stated the reasons I have above. > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > > > GC > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > > discuss-gnus...@gnu.org > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > Gnustep-dev@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev >
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
