Hi,
Le 01/08/2016 à 13:51, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit : >> On 1 Aug 2016, at 12:38, Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: >> >> This was my guess too, but it seemed like the use of exitLock is quite >> limited. I was not aware it was a recent change :-) >> >> Aside from someone trying to ask Oolite to fix their init, should we also >> cut a release of base then? > > I don't think base is anywhere near ready for the 1.25.0 release yet (but > it's far too much changed and binary incompatible for another 1.24.?). > > I would imagine a 1 line fix to explicitly initialise (for instance) NSDate > might solve things in Oolite. > > Alternatively, a patch for 1.24.9 in Debian to add/use exitLock might be an > option. Now gnustep-make is uploaded, I'm going to prepare an upload this week-end to close the RC bug in gnustep-base package( by disabling concurrent.m test). Do you think that add/use exitLock is preferable ? Eric _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
