Yes, I think that's what was stated in the sentence "a patch for 1.24.9 in Debian to add/use exitLock might be an option" means 0:-)
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Eric Heintzmann <heintzmann.e...@free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > > Le 01/08/2016 à 13:51, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit : > >> On 1 Aug 2016, at 12:38, Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: > >> > >> This was my guess too, but it seemed like the use of exitLock is quite > limited. I was not aware it was a recent change :-) > >> > >> Aside from someone trying to ask Oolite to fix their init, should we > also cut a release of base then? > > > > I don't think base is anywhere near ready for the 1.25.0 release yet > (but it's far too much changed and binary incompatible for another 1.24.?). > > > > I would imagine a 1 line fix to explicitly initialise (for instance) > NSDate might solve things in Oolite. > > > > Alternatively, a patch for 1.24.9 in Debian to add/use exitLock might be > an option. > Now gnustep-make is uploaded, I'm going to prepare an upload this > week-end to close the RC bug in gnustep-base package( by disabling > concurrent.m test). > Do you think that add/use exitLock is preferable ? > > Eric >
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev