So what policy are we settling on for this?  In the past I have had a
script to generate this for me.

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 17:41 Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On 29/10/2017 18:05, Matt Rice wrote:
> > I would change it something to the effect of:
> > "When submitting via a mailing list include your ChangeLog entry in
> > the contents of your email rather than in the diff."
>
> I second that. I like to apply the patch as-is, test it and have a
> "ready" change log entry to copy&paste, however a changelog "diff"
> creates most often a conflict, since a time and other changes might have
> mixed in, as well as I might have reviewed or modified the patch itself.
> In other words, I'd like to know what I am am patching, but a material
> diff to ChangeLog is a nuisance.
>
> Riccardo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>
-- 
Gregory Casamento
GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
http://ind.ie/phoenix/
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Reply via email to