> Am 03.02.2020 um 00:53 schrieb Sergii Stoian <stoyan...@gmail.com>: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 1:05 AM Fred Kiefer <fredkie...@gmx.de> wrote: > > I just ran a quick scan with valgrind and this did not detect any obvious > wrong memory access. Looking at the code once again I see that line 4276 may > be wrong for certain bytesPerRow values. Here the old code that copied over > line by line is safer. Maybe we could check bytesPerRow versus pixelsWide*4 > and use the old code if they are not the same? > > Line 4276 looks like this: "xcursorImage->yhot = hotp.y;" Do you mean memcpy > call at 4279?
Yes, it was line 4276 in the original merge commit, but has changed since then.
