I'll take these tarballs, upload to usual places and make an announcement likely tomorrow. Consider the tarballs final, even if I didn't upload them into usual places yet. Git tags are already pushed.
sent from phone On Sun 2 May 2021, 15:23 Gregory Casamento, <greg.casame...@gmail.com> wrote: > I did a build as well and ran the tests. Seems fine. > > GC > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:25 AM Riccardo Mottola < > riccardo.mott...@libero.it> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I did a build ot base/gui/back on linux/amd64 gcc and found no issues. >> Maybe this is enough to tell that the packages are complete. Didn't test >> for bugs on all platforms to know if you caught a good git version or not. >> >> Riccardo >> >> Ivan Vučica wrote: >> > (This is not a release announcement) >> > >> > A signed build of gnustep-gui / gnustep-back 0.29.0 has been uploaded >> > at http://badc0de.net/gs/2021. >> > >> > Actual final releases will, as always, be distributed via GNUstep FTP. >> > Please give this test build a go. >> > >> > === >> > >> > Psst! If you are using themes such as Rik, you might need to rebuild >> > them, even if there were no code changes. This is usually the case, I >> > suspect, as well; but today I was bit by it for the first time. It was >> > curious as I only saw problems on applications I rebuilt -- which in >> > retrospect makes sense, given the SO bump. >> > >> > === >> > >> > Now that all four libs are prepared, I will give it a few days to >> > receive a stop signal, or an actively-green-light from maintainers. >> > Then I will send out announcement emails, create GitHub releases, etc. >> > >> > Of course, if you spot a small thing that we _can_ fix post release >> > (i.e. not a full showstopper), I will be happy to cut a smaller >> > point-release. >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:34 PM Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: >> >> (This is not a release announcement) >> >> >> >> A signed build of gnustep-base 1.28.0 has been uploaded at >> >> http://badc0de.net/gs/2021. >> >> >> >> Actual final releases will, as always, be distributed via GNUstep FTP. >> >> Please give this test build a go. >> >> >> >> I will continue preparing gnustep-gui and gnustep-back. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 8:12 PM Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: >> >>> I am resuming work on releases today and hope to prepare at least >> >>> -base tarball today. >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:43 AM Frederik Seiffert >> >>> <frede...@algoriddim.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Am 22.03.2021 um 19:03 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald < >> rich...@frithmacdonald.me.uk>: >> >>>> >> >>>> IIRC the standard/historic behavior is that an object can retain >> itself in the -dealloc method, to extend its own lifetime, and I guess that >> the singletons do that (I haven't checked). >> >>>> I think that behavior changed for ARC, so it could be that the >> runtime is performing an ARC style deallocation when it should be calling >> NSDeallocateObject() (or something odd is going on in the >> NSDeallocateObject() function). >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I’ve pushed a change in the following PR that fixes the test failure: >> >>>> >> https://github.com/gnustep/libs-base/pull/177/commits/e1e661286a6b9d717dc0312bed5f8b4b5e549d6f >> >>>> >> >>>> Frederik >> >>>> >> >> >> > > -- > Gregory Casamento > GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant > http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com > https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=352392 - Become a Patron > https://gf.me/u/x8m3sx - My GNUstep GoFundMe > https://teespring.com/stores/gnustep - Store >
