(This is not a release announcement) A signed build of gnustep-gui / gnustep-back 0.29.0 has been uploaded at http://badc0de.net/gs/2021.
Actual final releases will, as always, be distributed via GNUstep FTP. Please give this test build a go. === Psst! If you are using themes such as Rik, you might need to rebuild them, even if there were no code changes. This is usually the case, I suspect, as well; but today I was bit by it for the first time. It was curious as I only saw problems on applications I rebuilt -- which in retrospect makes sense, given the SO bump. === Now that all four libs are prepared, I will give it a few days to receive a stop signal, or an actively-green-light from maintainers. Then I will send out announcement emails, create GitHub releases, etc. Of course, if you spot a small thing that we _can_ fix post release (i.e. not a full showstopper), I will be happy to cut a smaller point-release. On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:34 PM Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: > > (This is not a release announcement) > > A signed build of gnustep-base 1.28.0 has been uploaded at > http://badc0de.net/gs/2021. > > Actual final releases will, as always, be distributed via GNUstep FTP. > Please give this test build a go. > > I will continue preparing gnustep-gui and gnustep-back. > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 8:12 PM Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: > > > > I am resuming work on releases today and hope to prepare at least > > -base tarball today. > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:43 AM Frederik Seiffert > > <frede...@algoriddim.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 22.03.2021 um 19:03 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald > > > <rich...@frithmacdonald.me.uk>: > > > > > > IIRC the standard/historic behavior is that an object can retain itself > > > in the -dealloc method, to extend its own lifetime, and I guess that the > > > singletons do that (I haven't checked). > > > I think that behavior changed for ARC, so it could be that the runtime is > > > performing an ARC style deallocation when it should be calling > > > NSDeallocateObject() (or something odd is going on in the > > > NSDeallocateObject() function). > > > > > > > > > I’ve pushed a change in the following PR that fixes the test failure: > > > https://github.com/gnustep/libs-base/pull/177/commits/e1e661286a6b9d717dc0312bed5f8b4b5e549d6f > > > > > > Frederik > > >
