On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 00:32:02 +0100, Richard Stonehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex, > > First: is the gnustep-packagers mailing list still live? I've not > received anything from it for some time; don't know whether it's dead, > or whether something has wrong with my subscription details (but it used > to work in the early days) or my mail system? > > Second: you asked a little time ago (26th July) about the binary RPMs > I'd created. At the time, they weren't suitable for use. I've now built > new versions, based on the latest GNUstep, for a standard SuSE 9.1 > set-up. They're in: > > <URL:http://www.rstonehouse.co.uk/extras/gnustep/SuSE_9.1> > > and the files are: > > gnustep-make-1.9.2-1suse91.i586.rpm > gnustep-base-1.9.2-1suse91.i586.rpm > gnustep-gui-0.9.3-1suse91.i586.rpm > gnustep-back-0.9.3-1suse91.i586.rpm > GWorkspace-0.6.5-3suse91.i586.rpm > > These are likely to work /only/ for SuSE 9.1, due to library > dependencies; also, the init script in gnustep-base is SuSE-specific. > > I've tested that these install in a GNUstep-less machine and that > GWorkspace seems to work OK, but would welcome any problem reports or > other feedback. >
We're still here, just sleeping ;) I have a few friends who use SuSE who have expressed some interest in GNUstep. I'll be sure to pass this along to them so you can get some useful feedback. I'm afraid I'm just a humdrum Arch Linux user :P > > Richard Stonehouse > Cheers, Mike -- Michael Baehr - Arch Linux GNUstep Geek
