*Re: *"Finch access plan unlikely to fly across the
Atlantic<http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=422015&c=1>
"
(*Times Higher Education*, 6 December 2012)

It's not just the US and the Social Sciences that will not join the UK's
Gold Rush. Neither will Europe, nor Australia, nor the developing world.

The reason is simple: The Finch/RCUK/BIS policy was not thought through. It
was hastily and carelessly cobbled together without proper representation
from the most important stake-holders: researchers and their institutions,
the providers of the research to which access is to be opened.

Instead, Finch/RCUK/BIS heeded the lobbying from the UK's sizeable research
publishing industry, including both subscription publishers and Gold OA
publishers, as well as from a private biomedical research funder that was
rather too sure of its own OA strategy (even though that strategy has not
so far been very successful). BIS was also rather simplistic about the
"industrial applications" potential of its 6% of world research output, not
realizing that unilateral OA from one country is of limited usefulness, and
a globally scaleable OA policy requires some global thinking and
consultation.

Now it will indeed amount to "a handout from the British
government<http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=422015&c=1>"
-- a lot of money in exchange for very little OA -- unless (as I still
fervently hope) RCUK has the wisdom and character to fix its OA mandate as
it has by now been repeatedly urged from all sides to do, instead of just
digging in to a doomed policy:

Adopt an effective mechanism<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/342647/1/Oxtalk.pdf> to
ensure compliance with the mandate to self-archive in UK institutional
repositories (Green OA), in collaboration with UK institutions. And scale
down the Gold OA to just the affordable minimum for which there is a
genuine demand, instead of trying to force it down the throats of all UK
researchers in place of cost-free self-archiving: The UK institutional
repositories are already there: ready, waiting -- and empty.
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to