On 10 Dec 2013, at 13:05, Peter Murray-Rust <pm...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Elsevier are the worst offender that I have investigated, followed by
> Springer who took all my Open Access images, badged them as (C)
> SpringerImages and offered them for resale at 60 USD per image. Just because
> OA is only 5% of your business doesn't mean practice can be substandard.
Peter, what licence did you publish your OA images under? CC-BY? If so,
re-labelling them as "© Springer" is a form of copyright breach (actionable?),
but selling them isn't, of course.
Jan Velterop
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
