Wouter, Scirev, though having been live for a only a few weeks now, already has hundreds of crowdsourced journal reviews with information on peer review turn around times: http://scirev.sc/
But it would be nice indeed if we had more comprehensive data on this. Best, Jeroen Op 21 dec. 2013 om 18:02 heeft "Gerritsma, Wouter" <wouter.gerrit...@wur.nl<mailto:wouter.gerrit...@wur.nl>> het volgende geschreven: Dear all, With regards to this really excellent initiative I am looking in to the various degrees in transparency of the peer review process. Has anybody examples at hand of editorials, where they give an overview of number of articles submitted, and ultimately accepted, and the time the whole cycle from submission to final publication actually took. So now and then I have seen this in journals, but can’t find any example right now. I would be grateful for some hints. Wouter Wouter Gerritsma Team leader research support Information Specialist – Bibliometrician Wageningen UR Library PO box 9100 6700 HA Wageningen The Netherlands ++31 3174 83052 wouter.gerrit...@wur.nl<mailto:wouter.gerrit...@wur.nl%0d> wageningenur.nl/library<http://wageningenur.nl/library> @wowter<http://twitter.com/Wowter/> wowter.net<http://wowter.net/> #AWCP http://tinyurl.com/mk65m36 From: goal-boun...@eprints.org<mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org> [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of Claire Redhead Sent: donderdag 19 december 2013 16:41 To: goal@eprints.org<mailto:goal@eprints.org> Subject: [GOAL] Joint Statement on Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing The Committee on Publication Ethics<http://publicationethics.org/?>, the Directory of Open Access Journals<http://www.doaj.org/>, the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association<http://oaspa.org/>, and the World Association of Medical Editors<http://www.wame.org/> are scholarly organizations that have seen an increase in the number of membership applications from both legitimate and non-legitimate publishers and journals. Our organizations have collaborated in an effort to identify principles of transparency and best practice that set apart legitimate journals and publishers from non-legitimate ones and to clarify that these principles form part of the criteria on which membership applications will be evaluated. This is a work in progress and we welcome feedback on the general principles and the specific criteria. Please see the full statement<http://oaspa.org/principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing/> on the OASPA blog (http://oaspa.org/blog/). Claire Redhead Membership & Communications Manager Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, OASPA http://oaspa.org/ _______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list GOAL@eprints.org<mailto:GOAL@eprints.org> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list GOAL@eprints.org http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
