Dears,
   
  If you are a Goan or living in Goa, this is ON TOPIC for you.
   
  The Goa Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Bill, 2008 [Bill 14 of 2008] 
has been granted permission of the house and been introduced in the Goa 
Legislative Assembly in the Budget session ending 28 March, 2008. It may soon 
become an ORDINANCE to facilitate the construction of the  road by the 
Government of Goa through the property currently owned by M/s R.N.S. Bandekar 
[or Bandekar Brothers Pvt Ltd] at Cothombi [Kotumbi]village, in  Pale 
Constituency of Bicholim taluka. This act under the Land Aquisition Act,1894 is 
to facilitate an approach/access road for the jetty under construction  by 
Alcon Cement Co Pvt Ltd and the proposed jetty to be built by  Counto Metals & 
Mining Co Pvt Ltd, which is mainly meant for import and export of iron ore, 
cement, slag, coke and coal. No prizes for guessing the connection with the 
proposed Minor Sea Port near the historic Terekhol Fort, Kerim -Tiracol village 
panchayat [one of the 'selected' villages for the proposed 'pilot' project
 of the Task Force on RP 2021 through the Centre for Panchayati Raj this month].
   
  If this is one example of the type of PROJECTS that will be legally OUTSIDE 
the scope of the Regional Plan 2021, do we need a Regional Plan at all. Unless 
the Amendment Bill is withdrawn in toto the Regional Plan 2021 or any future 
regional plan makes no sense. The SEZs are GIDC's projects and the IT Parks are 
the IT Departments projects and hotels may well be Tourism Dept. projects 
....and all of these projects can be wet-leased or dry-leased, while we look on 
with gaping mouths saying "GO ...... AAHH!"  
   
  Mog asundi.
   
  Miguel
  

   
  Land acquisition to benefit private parties?
       
        BY HERALD REPORTER
PANJIM, MARCH 30– Can the government acquire land to facilitate a private 
company  to enhance their business interest?
One may not agree but Zuari Industries Ltd  has moved the court alleging that 
the government was in the process of  acquiring part of its land in Sancoale to 
hand it over to a Delhi-based top construction firm.
Another similar case has come to light wherein Bandekar Brothers Pvt Ltd have 
alleged that the government is acquiring part of its land at Cothombi village, 
Pale in Bicholim taluka to facilitate an approach/access road for the jetty 
under construction  by Alcon Cement Co Pvt Ltd and the proposed jetty to be 
built by  Counto Metals & Mining Co Pvt Ltd, which is mainly meant for import 
and export of iron ore, cement, slag, coke and coal.
In a writ petition filed in the Bombay High Court  Bandekars, who are in the 
mining business for more than 30 years, have pointed out that the land 
acquisition is being done under the garb of “public purpose” although the 
approach road is going to benefit the private party. 
According to the petitioner, the road for which land was acquired was to be the 
approach road for the project of the private firm. Alcons also had plans to set 
up  a cement factory at Surla in survey No 191/5.
The petitioner has prayed that the notification on land acquisition be quashed 
and set aside and so also the No Objection Certificate  issued by the Captain 
of Ports for construction of a jetty.
The case goes back to the point when Alcon Cement applied to Directorate of 
Mines for acquisition of the land for approach road after which the under 
secretary (revenue) recommended that the process be initiated.  Two months 
later, the Rane Cabinet took a decision for acquisition of the land. 
Accordingly, Captain of Ports granted NOC to Alcon Cement to construct a jetty 
in survey No 27/12 of Cothambi village. A couple of months later, the 
government issued a notification under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act which 
was later objected to by the Bandekars. 
According to the petitioner,  Alcon started work on the jetty in survey No 
27/12 for which they started using the then existing road. Some months later, a 
notification under Section 6 of the Act was issued by the government.
Pending the hearing of the petition, the Bandekars have sought for a stay on 
the implementation of the notification of land acquisition.
  In a writ petition filed in the Bombay High Court  Bandekars, who are in the 
mining business for more than 30 years, have pointed out that the land 
acquisition is being done under the garb of “public purpose” although the 
approach road is going to benefit the private party.




       
---------------------------------
 DELETE button is history. Unlimited mail storage is just a click away.

Reply via email to