From: bcsabha.kal...@gmail.com
To: 

From: NAGAR <i...@nagar.org.in>
Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:40 PM
Subject: Fw: Government Resolution by Govt. of Maharashtra to Revise errors in 
DP 2034
To: "nagar...@googlegroups.com" <nagar...@googlegroups.com>, "D. M. SUKTHANKAR" 
<dattatraya.sukthan...@gmail.com>, Kunti Oza <kunti...@yahoo.com>, Anand 
Akerkar <an...@akerkar.com>


Dear NAGAR Associate,Please find below the Government Resolution (GR) issued by 
Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra in connection with the 
DP.NAGAR suggests you write to the Chief Minister about your disappointment at 
the limited scope of the GR and that, for the sake of Mumbai’s future, a 
revised GR be issued directing the MCGM to revise the DP including a major 
course correction to make it inclusive and equitable. For this more time must 
be allocated.  
As per the Section 154 (1) of Maharashtra Regional and Town planning Act 1966 
(MR & TP Act 1966) the following order has been issued by Goverment of 
Maharashtra to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on 23rd April 
2015. (GR No. Development Plan 2015/ 9774/56/UD-11)  THE DIRECTIVE (translated 
into English)“The errors found after intensive verification of the Draft 
Development Plan 2034, published by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai on 
25.02.2015, should be corrected and updated after verifying the condition of 
error on the specific site, also byexamination of proposed development with 
reference to its quality, planning and legal aspect. The Draft Development Plan 
should be Re-published within a time period of 4 months for the suggestions/ 
objections for the citizens with prior approval from the assembly, by following 
the provisions of Maharashtra Regional and Town planning Act 1966, Chapter 3, 
Section 26.”The above directive is in force from the date of the GR (i.e. from 
23rdApril 2015) Also find enclosed an article published in Hindustan Times by 
Shailesh Gaikwad. This article articulates issues of the directive in 
detail.RegardsAnjali PanditAssociate DirectorNAGARCecil Court, 3rd 
flr.,Mahakavi Bhushan Marg,Colaba, Mumbai - 400001
T: 022-22882018
T/F: 022-22021621
W: www.nagar.org.inE: i...@nagar.org.in 
fb: www.facebook.com/nagar.org.inTwitter: twitter.com/NAGAR_Ngo




=========
Mumbai DP issue will be the test of CM Fadnavis’ credibility
http://www.hindustantimes.com/mumbai/mumbai-dp-issue-will-be-the-test-of-cm-fadnavis-credibility/article1-1341864.aspx

Following protests by citizens across Mumbai, the Maharashtra government was 
forced to announce that it will change the draft development plan (DP), which 
was in the midst of controversy owing to a large number of errors and also 
provisions that were being criticised by urban planners and citizen groups.
Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis on April 21 announced that the controversial 
draft would be scrapped and t he Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) would 
be asked to prepare a new one in four months.
While addressing the postcabinet meeting press conference, Fadnavis was pretty 
clear that he wanted to junk the draft. The notification issued by the urban 
development department headed by him, however, is not as clear. The April 23 
notification directs the BMC to examine the errors in the draft DP detail, 
correct the same and publish the draft for review by the citizens. It does not 
say whether the new proposals or concepts that have attracted criticism will be 
reviewed. This is where citizen groups and experts are wary of the state 
government’s intentions. They fear that the same draft will be presented in a 
new packaging by making some cosmetic changes.
The errors in the existing land use are just a part of the objections raised 
over the draft DP. The other aspects are probably more significant to the 
future of the city.
There could be a serious fallout of certain provisions such as increasing the 
floor space index (that allows vertical development) upto 8 in various parts of 
the city that are already congested.
Residents in areas such as Bandra or Andheri are wary of the concepts such as 
transit-oriented development and commercial-residential, where pure residential 
areas will need to have commercial structures too, if they are going in for 
redevelopment. The high floor space index (FSI) also comes at a very high 
premium, which means the real estate prices will keep increasing and there will 
be nothing such as affordable housing, which is what this city needs. 
Unfortunately, the draft DP did not bother to consider affordable housing as an 
element, which is a significant issue for more than half of the city’s 
population.
The government or BMC doesn’t want to discuss why they are keen to destruct the 
remaining few green patches that help the city breathe — Aarey Colony, 
mangroves and even salt pan lands. The draft has shown complete disregard for 
heritage structures, sites and precincts in the city. The authorities probably 
want to believe that Mumbai’s citizens want a hideous crowd of skyscrapers that 
have come up in central Mumbai or Sakinaka, instead of an area like Fort with 
elegant buildings and well-designed avenues.
Experts have also lamented that the draft DP completely neglects 
recommendations made during consultation with sectoral experts and institutions 
especially in health, education, livelihood, environment, governance, water and 
sanitation, informal sector, transportation and digital inclusion. Worse, 
two-thirds of Mumbai is not included in the draft DP provisions, as slums as 
well as areas under special planning authorities such as MMRDA (Dharavi, 
Wadala, Bandra- Kurla Complex, Seepz, Oshiwara, Bandra Reclamation and Backbay).
So far, there are little indications that these concerns will be seriously 
discussed and will be taken care of in the new draft. If the state government 
is going to be ambiguous, it won’t be a surprise what the civic officials will 
do. According to the information, the first thing the civic officials have 
resorted to after the CM’s announcement is to prepare a presentation on how the 
errors pointed out by the citizens, experts and media are not errors, but 
wrongful interpretation.
It is upto Fadnavis to prove that the directives issued by him are not reduced 
to a ploy to fool the citizens. As of now, the citizens are of the opinion that 
the draft DP is favourable to builders and not them. Overhauling it in the 
interest of the city is what they are expecting from the government. One hopes 
Fadnavis won’t disappoint the citizens now.




                                          

Reply via email to