By: Ramachandra Guha
Published in: *Scroll*
Date: January 7, 2026
Source:
https://scroll.in/article/1089800/ramachandra-guha-in-praise-of-dr-umar-khalid-from-one-historian-to-another
The young scholar’s work, though not without its flaws, is one of one of
the most accomplished doctoral dissertations by an Indian that I have read.

Early romantic crushes rarely endure, but early scholarly interests often
do. I began my career as a historian of forest communities whose lives were
rudely disrupted by British colonial rule. Though I have since meandered
off into other directions, I have always retained a connection to the field
I first began to till. In fact, I have spent the past week reading a
doctoral thesis by a young scholar which explores the social and
environmental history of what is now the state of Jharkhand. I was so
struck by how good the thesis is that I thought I should write about it in
this column.

The thesis focuses on the transformations of Adivasi society in the region
of Singhbhum under British rule. It first documents how the East India
Company steadily acquired military and administrative control over the
territory. It then examines how colonialism radically reshaped the natural
landscape, the legal framework, and the economic and political structures
of Singhbhum.

Among the important themes covered are the commercial biases of colonial
forest policy, the changing status of village headmen who had to negotiate
with the new order, and the responses of the tribal communities to the
transformation in their lives that colonial rule wrought. While focusing on
ecology, society, and politics, the scholar also pays due attention to
intellectual history, presenting sharp analyses of the works of both
European officials and Indian anthropologists on the tribals of Singhbhum.

There were six significant attributes that this young historian’s work
displayed which I discuss below:

First, an authoritative command of the literature on Adivasis by previous
writers, both well-known and obscure, whether on the tribes of Jharkhand or
on the tribes of other parts of India;

Second, the ability to locate and use a wide range of primary sources. The
thesis rested on a staggering amount of research in national, state and
district archives, and in obscure essays and books published more than a
century ago;

Third, the willingness to acquire supplementary knowledge by fieldwork in
the region under study. The young scholar seemed to have taken to heart the
dictum of the great French historian, Marc Bloch, that a historian needs
thicker boots as well as thicker notebooks;

Fourth, an eye for vivid quotations from primary sources to illustrate his
arguments. This, for example, is a British official in the 19th century
writing about a hunt in the forests, and presenting a colourful picture of
an apparently always unchanging tribal life: “Here are the ever dancing and
singing Sontals, dressed out in flowers and feathers, with flutes
ornamented with streamers made of pith, the wild Kurrias, or hill men, from
the Luckisinnee hills in Borahbhoom; the Koormies, Taunties, Soondees,
Gwallas, Bhoomijes&c, with sonorous ‘dammas’ or kettle drums, and other
uncouth music, armed with swords, bulwas, and bows and arrows of every
description; the Hos, simple and unpretending, but with the heaviest game
bags…”

Another quote, from a century later and sourced from a file in the
archives, has a participant in the Non-Cooperation Movement of the 1920s,
saying (in translation): “Swaraj has now been attained and Gandhi is head
of it. The English are leaving the country and the few Englishmen in
Chaibasa would run away in three or four months time… No rents would be
paid. Gandhi Mahatma would establish a school and the schools of Government
would be destroyed. No fees would be paid in Gandhi’s school”;

Fifth, the ability to write up his material in clear and often compelling
prose, with little academic jargon;

Sixth, a nuanced and subtle elaboration of his arguments. The scholar was
particularly careful not to reproduce the stereotypes of tribal life common
to colonial officials and contemporary activists. He presents a thoughtful
critique of writings that present a straight line between tribal protests
in the colonial era and in the present, “as having been prompted by the
modern state’s disturbance of the previously idyllic custom based world of
the adivasis”. The scholar speaks of how these writings are guilty of
“essentialising adivasis as homogeneous communities operating through
age-old and unchanging customs and traditions”. His own research, on the
other hand, shows that “while many Adivasis resist the incursions of the
state”, other “sections of them also collaborate with it; some also
negotiate to enhance their standing vis-à-vis others in their communities”.
Awaiting an editor

However, this thesis was not without its faults. The scholar had overlooked
some crucial secondary sources that bear directly on his work, such as the
writings of TN Madan on the history of Indian anthropology. I wished he had
made more use of folklore and oral history. And not all the quotes from
primary sources were as telling as the ones I have highlighted in this
column. Some were far too long and diluted the narrative.

Nonetheless, this was one of the most accomplished doctoral dissertations
by an Indian that I have read. Normally a thesis of this quality is
published as a book a few years down the line, its flaws ironed out by a
good editor. If one looks at comparable works in this field of
environmental/social history, such as Nandini Sundar’s *Subalterns and
Sovereigns* and Mahesh Rangarajan’s *Fencing the Forest*, they both saw a
gap of merely a few years between thesis submission and book publication.
The same sort of time lag has been witnessed for more recent historical
monographs, by, among others, Bhavani Raman, Aditya Balasubramanian, Nikhil
Menon, and Dinyar Patel, all of which started out as doctoral dissertations.

These books have been widely read and admired. I have no question that the
thesis I just read would likewise be widely appreciated when it is
published as a book. Tragically, although the thesis was submitted in 2018,
it hasn’t still appeared in book form. This is because the scholar’s name
is Umar Khalid. A cruel and punitive state, coupled with a tardy judicial
system, has – at the time of writing this column – kept this talented
historian in prison for more than five years, without bail, and without
even formal charges being filed.

I have never met or spoken with Dr Umar Khalid myself. However, on one day
in December 2019, we both took part in a peaceful countrywide protest
against a discriminatory law, he in Delhi and I in Bengaluru. In the years
since, I have sometimes wondered at the different paths our lives have
taken, and the reasons for this. Have I been able to carry on my research
and writing, whereas he has not, because my first name is Ramachandra and
not Umar?
Depth and richness

I have written about Dr Khalid here because, as a historian of modern India
myself, I am in a position to appreciate the depth and richness of his
scholarly work. But as I close this column, I must note that he is one of
many fine, upright men and women, who are languishing in jail under dubious
charges hastily filed by the police under orders from their political
masters. Some of these Indians are also scholars and researchers.

Others are social workers and civil society activists, who have in their
life and work shown themselves to be steadfastly committed to non-violence
and the founding values of the Indian Constitution. It is this commitment
to pluralism and democracy, and perhaps nothing else, that has made them
fall foul of the authoritarian and majoritarian tendencies of the ruling
regime. So these remarkable young compatriots of ours have come to spend
their best years in dark, dingy, and insalubrious prisons, when they could
be contributing so much to the life of our Republic. It is surely past time
that our judges find the decency and the courage to deliver the freedom
that is currently denied to them all.

*Ramachandra Guha’s latest book, *Speaking with Nature: The Origins of
Indian Environmentalism*, is now in stores. His email address is *
*[email protected]* <[email protected]>*.*

Reply via email to